The question itself seems stupid, doesn't it?
"Did I Rape Her?"
Let me start out with an apology - maybe this isn't the forum, maybe this isn't even the way I should be doing it, but I'm out of ideas:
To any girl who's been sexually assaulted or raped by me, I am sorry. Truly, deeply sorry. This post is, in a way, my attempt to begin righting my wrongdoings.
To my knowledge, I have not sexually assaulted or raped anyone - but
a recent article about "Nice Guys" and rape, and responses to that article, have gotten me thinking. The article is by Alyssa Royse over at the Good Men Project, you'll find a story about Royse's friend, a male, getting accused of rape and coming to Royse to sort through the event and accusation. In subsequent responses like
this or
this, Royse is attacked for taking the blame off of her male friend and moving it to society. While most agreed society has a role, they continued to argue as if Royse was setting feminism and rape culture back by decades, if not more. "The guy is a rapist," they said (I'm paraphrasing), "and he shouldn't get away with it."
Royse IS credited with never denouncing the act in question as rape - she's very clear on that point. And I agree that this
was rape. From the small amount of information provided in the original article, we see that the two parties in question were partying, drinking, and then found themselves sleeping with (not sexing) each other. The victim then awoke to penetration by the perpetrator (Royse's friend). The clear response to this scenario is something akin to a Facebook response I received when I shared these articles - "A guy should know that when a girl is asleep, it's not okay to have sex with her." I mean, ostensibly, this is true, but the incident as portrayed in Royse's article is (understandably) light on detail.
The argument is, "Men should know not to rape." Maybe it even goes further - "People should know..." - but I think what the responses to Royse's article failed to take into account is that maybe this guy
was a "nice guy." I hate using personal examples - one can never provide too much detail - but they've become the norm in discussions like these. Rape is a charged issue, as it should be, but because personal examples inherently carry incredibly private details and triggering circumstances, the situations can never really be discussed in public. I think the response that follows this particular desire-for-details is one of "Why does it need to be discussed?" because there's this sense that some agent of patriarchy (I am not in any way using this sarcastically) will attempt to use details to nitpick and victim blame. There's validity in that thought - there's a tendency amongst males to get incredibly defensive about situations like this, and in their defensiveness, to focus too much on getting out of trouble and not enough on fixing this huge systemic problem we have.